Menu
Situs Panduan dan Solusi Terkini

$1 trillion infrastructure deal widens Senate hurdle with bipartisan vote

  • Share
banner 468x60

The Senate on Wednesday voted in favor of a bipartisan $1 trillion infrastructure bill that would make far-reaching investments in the nation’s public works system, as Republicans joined Democrats in paving the way for action on an significant part of President Biden’s agenda.

banner 336x280

The 67-32 vote, which included 17 Republicans in favour, came just hours following centrist senators in both parties and the White House reached a lengthy-awaited compromise on the bill, which would preserve about $550 billion in unused federal money for the roads. bridges, railways, transit, water and other physical infrastructure programs.

Among those who supported moving forward was Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader who had lengthy thwarted key legislation pushed by Democratic presidents. Mr. McConnell’s support suggests that his party has been – at fewest for now – begin to working with Democrats to enact the plan.

The agreement still faces many obstacles to becoming law, including turning it into a formal legislative text and filtering final votes in the closely divided Senate and House of Representatives. But the vote was a triumph for a president who has lengthy promised to burst the partisan stalemate controlling Congress and accomplish big things backed by members of both political parties.

If the measure is enacted, it will be the largest infusion of federal funds into the public works system in more than a decade.

The settlement, still in writing as of Wednesday, includes $110 billion for roads, bridges and major projects. $66 billion for passenger and freight trains. 39 billion dollars for public transportation. $65 billion for broadband; $17 billion for ports and waterways; and $46 billion to aid states and cities prepare for droughts, wildfires, floods and other consequences of climate change, according to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

In a lengthy statement, Mr. Biden hailed the deal as “the most significant lengthy-term investment in our infrastructure and competitiveness in nearly a century.”

He also formulated it as proof of his belief in the two parties.

“Neither side got everything they wanted in this deal,” Biden said. But that’s what it means to compromise and reach consensus – the essence of democracy. With the deal moving to the entire Senate, there is still a lot of work ahead of us to bring this home. There will be disagreements to resolve and more compromises to advance along the way.”

That was apparent on Wednesday even as the president and senators from both parties welcomed their agreement. in their negotiation, mr. Biden and Democratic leaders were forced to agree to concessions, accept more unused federal money for public transportation and clean energy projects than they wanted, including for some electric car charging stations, and drop their shove for additional IRS tax funding. A senior Democrat aide noted that Democrats secured expansion of existing transit and highway programs compared to 2015, the final time such legislation passed).

The changes—and omissions of some of their top priorities—ranked progressives in both houses, with some threatening to oppose the bill unless it was amended.

Rep. Peter A. said: Oregon’s DeFazio, Chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Commission: “From what we’ve heard, following we haven’t seen a text, this bill would be the status quo, the policy of the 1950s with a few little additions.”

“If that’s what I think,” he added, “I would oppose.”

However, the compromise between the two parties was a critical component of the master. Biden’s $4 trillion economic agenda, which Democrats plan to pair with a $3.5 trillion budget blueprint that would provide additional spending for climate, health concern and education, through Congress over Republican objections.

The vote to move forward with the infrastructure bill came following weeks of haggling by a group of senators and White House officials to translate a blueprint they agreed on late final month into legislation. Just final week, Senate Republicans unanimously halted consideration of the plan, saying there were too many unresolved controversies. But by Wednesday, following several days of frantic conversations, late-night phone calls and texts between senators and White House officials, negotiators announced they were ready to move on.

“We look forward to moving forward, and having the opportunity to have a healthy discussion here in the room on a project that is so significant to the American people,” said Senator Rob Portman, Ohio Republican and one of the chief negotiators.

Many of the spending provisions in the bill remain unchanged from the original agreement. But it appears to have cut spending in a few areas, including cutting funds for public transportation to $39 billion from $49 billion, and eliminating $20 billion from an “infrastructure bank” that was meant to spur private investment in big projects. The negotiators could not agree on the structure of the bank and the terms of its financing power, so they removed it completely.

The Infrastructure Bank loss appears to have cut in half the funding for electric vehicle charging stations that administration officials said were included in the original agreement, exposing Mr. Biden promised to build a network of 500,000 charging stations across the country.

The unused agreement also included major changes to how infrastructure spending is paid, following Republicans resisted supporting one of the pillars of the original framework: raising revenue from the IRS’ tax fraud campaign, which was supposed to provide nearly a fifth of the funding. for the plan.

In lieu of that lost revenue, negotiators agreed to repurpose more than $250 billion in previous pandemic assist legislation, including $50 billion in expanded unemployment benefits that were prematurely rescinded this summer by two dozen Republican governors, according to a fact sheet reviewed by The New York Times. This is more than double the money redirected into the original transaction.

The unused agreement will preserve $50 billion by delaying the Medicare deduction rule that was passed under President Donald J. Trump and hoist nearly $30 billion by implementing tax information reporting requirements on cryptocurrencies. It also proposes recovering $50 billion in fraudulently paid unemployment benefits during the pandemic.

Fiscal hawks were quick to dismiss some of these financing mechanisms as over-confident or accounting tricks, and warned that the agreement would add to the federal budget deficit over time. But business groups and some moderates in Washington quickly assessed the deal.

Jack Howard, senior vice president for government affairs at the US Chamber of Commerce, which has worked for several months to broker a bipartisan deal that does not include corporate tax increases, said spending in the agreement “would provide tremendous benefits to US people and the economy.”

“Our nation has been waiting for infrastructure upgrades for more than a decade, and this is a critical step in the process,” he said.

Over lunch on Wednesday, the Republicans who led the deal distributed volumes containing a summary of what would be a 1,000-page bill. The group of 10 primary negotiators held a celebratory press conference where they thanked colleagues on both sides for their support.

“It’s not flawless but it’s, I think, in a pleasing place,” said Senator Tom Telles, a Republican from North Carolina, who voted to accept the bill.

After the vote, Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and majority leader, expressed optimism that the Senate would be competent to pass not only the bipartisan infrastructure package, but the $3.5 trillion budget outline needed to launch the most extensive reconciliation package to implement. the rest of mr. Biden’s agenda.

“My goal remains to pass both the bipartisan infrastructure bill and budget resolution during this working period — both,” Mr. “Long nights” and weekend sessions, Schumer said. “We’ll get the job done, and we’re on the right track.”

Democrats still have to manipulate the bill through the evenly divided Senate, maintaining the support of all 50 Democrats, independents, and at fewest 10 Republicans. That could take at fewest a week, especially if Republicans opposed to it choose to slow down the process. If the measure passes the Senate, it would also have to pass the House, where some Liberal Democrats have held back on emerging details.

But the Republicans who negotiated the deal urged colleagues to support a measure they said would provide much-needed funding for infrastructure projects across the country.

“I am amazed that there are those who are against it, just because they think that if I do something somehow, it is a sign of weakness,” said Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana.

California House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has repeatedly said she won’t take up the bipartisan infrastructure bill in the House until the more driven $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill passes the Senate.

Senator Kirsten Senema of Arizona, the lead Democratic negotiator on the infrastructure deal and the lead temperate vote, issued a statement Wednesday saying she does not support an expensive plan, though she would not seek to block it. These comments prompted many liberals in the House of Representatives to threaten to reject the bipartisan agreement they helped negotiate, underscoring the compromise’s fragility.

“Good luck investing your party’s investments in child concern, climate action, and infrastructure assuming you’ll survive 3 House margin votes,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York Democrat, Posted in Tweet. Especially following choosing to exclude members of color from the negotiations and calling it a ‘bipartisan achievement’.

Contribute to reporting Nicholas VandusAnd Coral DavenportAnd Katie Edmondson And Lisa Friedman.



Referensi: www.nytimes.com

banner 336x280
banner 120x600
  • Share